Depression is a risk factor for metabolic syndrome: Results from the ELSA-Brasil cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) and depression comorbidity has been recognized, but its directionality is still uncertain. The aims of this study was to assess the association between depression (diagnosis and severity) and MetS (components, diagnosis and trajectory) in the baseline and over a 4-year follow-up period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Baseline and follow-up data from 13,883 participants of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health were analyzed. The Clinical Interview Schedule Revised assessed depressive episode and its severity. MetS components and diagnosis were assessed according to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III. Participants were grouped according to MetS trajectory as recovered, incident and persistent MetS. Logistic regression analysis was conducted estimating odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). RESULTS: Baseline depression was positively associated with recovered (OR = 1.59, 95%CI 1.18-2.14), incident (OR = 1.45, 95%CI 1.09-1.91) and persistent (OR = 1.70, 95%CI 1.39-2.07) MetS. Baseline depression was also associated with large waist circumference (OR = 1.47, 95%CI 1.23-1.75), high triglycerides (OR = 1.23, 95%CI 1.02-1.49), low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR = 1.30, 95%CI 1.08-1.56), and hyperglycemia (OR = 1.38, 95%CI 1.15-1.66) at follow-up. Having three or more MetS components at follow-up was associated with baseline depression, with a positive dose-response effect (OR = 1.77, 95%CI 1.29-2.43; OR = 1.79, 95%CI 1.26-2.54; OR = 2.27, 95%CI 1.50-3.46, respectively). The magnitude of associations was greater in severe depression, when compared to moderate and mild. DISCUSSION: These results support that depression is a risk factor for the development of MetS and highlights the need to follow metabolic and cardiovascular alterations in the presence of depression.

Sustainability in food service: A systematic review.

The irrational functioning of the food sector can negatively impact the environment and resources for future generations. The aim of this study is to analyse the assessment of sustainability indicators related to meal production processes and waste in the food service through a systematic literature review. The hypothesis is that these indicators are still little explored. This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols. The databases consulted were Lilacs, Science Direct, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, OpenGrey and Greylit. Six different search strategies were applied, combining the terms sustainability and food service, plus manual searches. The search took place until April 2020 and there was no language restriction of the studies. After removing duplicates, 770 publications were identified through the search process, with 44 having been included in this review. Most publications carried out the quantification of food waste (38/44), while in 7/44 there were questionnaires, checklists and water footprint assessments. Most studies identified high indicators of waste, as well as little awareness of sustainability. Factors such as controlled portioning, omnivorous menus and dissatisfaction with the menu were reported to have caused the greatest losses in the process. This review identified a restricted assessment of sustainability in food service, countering the need to deepen these indicators and the effect of meal production processes on sustainable development.

Associations of depression and intake of antioxidants and vitamin B complex: Results of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil).

BACKGROUND: Optimum functioning of the central nervous system is dependent on a wide range of nutrients, so mental illness can be impacted by diet via several mechanisms. We aimed to investigate the associations of antioxidants (vitamin A, C and E, and selenium and zinc) and vitamin B complex (B6, folate and B12) intake with depression in 14,737 subjects of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health. METHODS: Baseline cross-sectional data was analyzed. Micronutrients intake was measured using the Food Frequency Questionnaire, and depression was assessed using the Clinical Interview Schedule Revised. Logistic regression models were built using daily intake quintiles of micronutrients. RESULTS: A significant inverse relationship was observed between depression and higher intake of selenium, zinc, vitamins B6 and B12 for the total sample. Among women, a similar pattern of associations was observed, in addition to the higher intake of vitamins A and C. Among men, a significant inverse relationship between depression was observed only with the intake of vitamins B12 and B6. Higher total antioxidant intake was significantly associated with lower odds of depression and an inverse dose-response effect between total antioxidant intake and clinical severity of depression was observed among women, in adjusted models. LIMITATIONS: Recall bias in assessing diet. Misclassification bias regarding current depression. CONCLUSIONS: Depression is associated with lower intake of antioxidants and B vitamins. Higher intake of selected micronutrients may contribute to reduce depression occurrence and severity.

Indicadores de obesidade e resistência à insulina: uma revisão sistemática / Obesity indicators and insulin resistance: a systematic review

O objetivo deste estudo foi verificar os indicadores de obesidade associados à resistência à insulina, através de uma revisão sistemática. Dois revisores independentes realizaram uma busca nas bases de dados Medline, Pubmed, LILACS, IBECS-ES e MedCarib até abril de 2019, incluindo estudos caso-controle, coorte ou delineamento transversal, em adultos. A qualidade dos artigos foi avaliada por meio do Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Foram adotadas as normas do PRISMA para a condução da revisão, com protocolo registrado no PROSPERO. Foram incluídos na revisão 12 artigos. Associação positiva entre indicador de obesidade e HOMA-IR foi observada em todos os estudos. O indicador de obesidade que mais esteve positivamente associado ao HOMA-IR foi o IMC, seguido da circunferência da cintura. Os indicadores de obesidade estão associados ao HOMA-IR podendo ser uma ferramenta útil no rastreio da resistência à insulina.

The aim of this study was to verify the obesity indicators associated with insulin resistance by a systematic review. Two independent reviewers performed a search on Medline, Pubmed, LILACS, IBECS-ES and MedCarib databases up to April 2019, which included case-control, cohort or cross-sectional studies in adults. Articles' quality was assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. PRISMA guideline for conducting the review were adopted, with protocol registered at PROSPERO. Twelve articles were included in the review. All studies reported a positive association between obesity indicators and HOMA-IR. Obesity indicator most positively associated with HOMA-IR was BMI, followed by waist circumference. Obesity indicators are associated with HOMA-IR and may be a useful tool for screening insulin resistance.

Depression subtypes and obesity in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Examining clinical features of depressive episodes may help elucidating the nature of association between depression and obesity, related to specific symptoms such as appetite and weight changes. This meta-analysis of observational studies evaluated whether subtypes of depression are associated with specific anthropometric profiles in adults. We searched MEDLINE, LILACS, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science databases, and Grey Literature for articles published up to October 2016 that examined depressive subtypes and adiposity measures among adults. The pooled effect size was estimated with random effects models. The PRISMA guidelines were adopted to reporting results, and this review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42016035685). A total of 22 articles were included in this systematic review, of which eight had data included in the meta-analysis, assessing 14 757 individuals with depression. Patients with atypical depression presented a 2.55 higher BMI score compared with those with melancholic depression. Subgroup analysis identified a differential distribution of anthropometric measures in studies conducted with Chinese populations. Among the remainder studies, only one reported discrepant results, possibly due to the exclusion of "weight change" in defining subtypes of depression. Atypical depression was significantly associated with elevated BMI compared with melancholic depression, deserving particular attention due to its clinical importance.

[Underestimation of obesity and overweight based on self-report measures in the general population: prevalence and a proposal for correction models]. / Subestimativa de obesidade e sobrepeso a partir de medidas autorrelatadas na população geral: prevalência e proposta de modelos para correção.

The study's objectives: compare self-report measures of weight and height with direct measures; assess the impact of these discrepancies on body mass index (BMI) and prevalence of overweight and obesity; and apply correction models to the self-report measures and assess the degree of improvement in the corrected measures produced with the use of these models. A cross-sectional study was performed, assessing 4,151 adults (18 to 60 years) participating in the São Paulo Megacity Epidemiological Study. Linear regression models stratified by sex were proposed for correction of self-reported measures. Agreement was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient for the direct measures, self-report measures, and corrected measures, and kappa coefficient for BMI classification categories. Self-reported weight and the resulting BMI were underestimated, while height was overestimated, compared to direct measures. With all the correction models, the corrected measures were closer to the direct measures. Prevalence rates for excess weight, calculated by self-report measures, were underestimated by 24% in men and by 28% in women; with corrections, the underestimation decreased to 8% and 10%, respectively. The results showed moderate agreement for self-report measures and substantial agreement for corrected measures compared to direct measures. The use of correction equations for self-report data proved to be a useful method for producing more trustworthy estimates of prevalence of overweight and obesity in the general population, usually estimated from self-report measures of weight and height in population surveys.

Os objetivos deste artigo são: (i) comparar medidas autorrelatadas de peso e estatura com medidas aferidas; (ii) avaliar o impacto dessas discrepâncias sobre o índice de massa corporal (IMC) e as prevalências de sobrepeso e obesidade; e (iii) aplicar modelos de correção das medidas autorrelatadas e avaliar o grau de melhoria das medidas corrigidas produzidas pelo uso desses modelos. Realizou-se estudo transversal, com avaliação de 4.151 adultos (18 a 60 anos) participantes do Estudo Epidemiológico dos Transtornos Mentais São Paulo Megacity. Foram propostos e testados modelos de regressão linear estratificados por sexo, para a correção das medidas autorrelatadas. Para avaliar a concordância, usou-se o coeficiente de correlação intraclasse para as medidas aferidas, medidas autorrelatadas e medidas corrigidas, bem como o coeficiente kappa para as categorias de classificação do IMC. O peso autorrelatado e o IMC resultantes foram subestimados, ao passo que a estatura foi superestimada, comparados às medidas aferidas. Com todos os modelos de correção, as medidas corrigidas tornaram-se mais próximas às medidas aferidas. As prevalências de excesso de peso, quando calculadas a partir das medidas autorrelatadas, estavam subestimadas em 24% em homens e 28% em mulheres. Com as correções, a subestimativa diminuiu para 8% e 10%, respectivamente. Identificou-se concordância moderada para as medidas autorrelatadas e concordância substancial para as medidas corrigidas, quando comparadas às medidas reais. O uso de equações de correção para dados autorrelatados mostrou-se um método útil para produzir estimativas mais fidedignas da prevalência de excesso de peso e obesidade na população geral, geralmente estimadas a partir de medidas de peso e estatura autorrelatadas nos inquéritos populacionais.

Los objetivos fueron: comparar medidas autoinformadas de peso y estatura con medidas evaluadas; evaluar el impacto de estas discrepancias sobre el índice de masa corporal (IMC) y las prevalencias de sobrepeso y obesidad; y aplicar modelos de corrección de las medidas autoinformadas y evaluar el grado de mejoría de las medidas corregidas, producidas por el uso de esos modelos. Se realizó un estudio transversal evaluando a 4.151 adultos (18 a 60 años), participantes en el Estudio Epidemiológico São Paulo Megacity. Se propusieron y probaron modelos de regresión lineal estratificados por sexo para la corrección de las medidas autoinformadas. Para evaluar la concordancia, se usó el coeficiente de correlación intraclase para las medidas evaluadas, medidas autoinformadas y medidas corregidas, y el coeficiente kappa para las categorías de clasificación del IMC. El peso autoinformado y el IMC resultantes fueron subestimados mientras la estatura fue sobrestimada, comparados con las medidas evaluadas. Con todos los modelos de corrección, las medidas corregidas se convirtieron en más cercanas a las medidas evaluadas. Las prevalencias de exceso de peso, cuando se calculan a partir de las medidas autoinformadas, estaban subestimadas en un 24% en hombres y un 28% en las mujeres; con las correcciones, la infravaloración disminuyó a un 8% y un 10%, respectivamente. Se identificó una concordancia moderada para las medidas autoinformadas y una concordancia sustancial para las medidas corregidas, cuando se compararon con las medidas reales. El uso de ecuaciones de corrección para dados autoinformados se mostró un método útil para producir estimaciones más fidedignas de la prevalencia de exceso de peso y obesidad en la población general, generalmente estimadas a partir de medidas de peso y estatura autoinformadas en las encuestas poblacionales.

Subestimativa de obesidade e sobrepeso a partir de medidas autorrelatadas na população geral: prevalência e proposta de modelos para correção / Underestimation of obesity and overweight based on self-report measures in the general population: prevalence and a proposal for correction models / Infravaloración de obesidad y sobrepeso a partir de medidas autoinformadas en población general: prevalencia y propuesta de modelos para su corrección

Os objetivos deste artigo são: (i) comparar medidas autorrelatadas de peso e estatura com medidas aferidas; (ii) avaliar o impacto dessas discrepâncias sobre o índice de massa corporal (IMC) e as prevalências de sobrepeso e obesidade; e (iii) aplicar modelos de correção das medidas autorrelatadas e avaliar o grau de melhoria das medidas corrigidas produzidas pelo uso desses modelos. Realizou-se estudo transversal, com avaliação de 4.151 adultos (18 a 60 anos) participantes do Estudo Epidemiológico dos Transtornos Mentais São Paulo Megacity. Foram propostos e testados modelos de regressão linear estratificados por sexo, para a correção das medidas autorrelatadas. Para avaliar a concordância, usou-se o coeficiente de correlação intraclasse para as medidas aferidas, medidas autorrelatadas e medidas corrigidas, bem como o coeficiente kappa para as categorias de classificação do IMC. O peso autorrelatado e o IMC resultantes foram subestimados, ao passo que a estatura foi superestimada, comparados às medidas aferidas. Com todos os modelos de correção, as medidas corrigidas tornaram-se mais próximas às medidas aferidas. As prevalências de excesso de peso, quando calculadas a partir das medidas autorrelatadas, estavam subestimadas em 24% em homens e 28% em mulheres. Com as correções, a subestimativa diminuiu para 8% e 10%, respectivamente. Identificou-se concordância moderada para as medidas autorrelatadas e concordância substancial para as medidas corrigidas, quando comparadas às medidas reais. O uso de equações de correção para dados autorrelatados mostrou-se um método útil para produzir estimativas mais fidedignas da prevalência de excesso de peso e obesidade na população geral, geralmente estimadas a partir de medidas de peso e estatura autorrelatadas nos inquéritos populacionais.

The study's objectives: compare self-report measures of weight and height with direct measures; assess the impact of these discrepancies on body mass index (BMI) and prevalence of overweight and obesity; and apply correction models to the self-report measures and assess the degree of improvement in the corrected measures produced with the use of these models. A cross-sectional study was performed, assessing 4,151 adults (18 to 60 years) participating in the São Paulo Megacity Epidemiological Study. Linear regression models stratified by sex were proposed for correction of self-reported measures. Agreement was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient for the direct measures, self-report measures, and corrected measures, and kappa coefficient for BMI classification categories. Self-reported weight and the resulting BMI were underestimated, while height was overestimated, compared to direct measures. With all the correction models, the corrected measures were closer to the direct measures. Prevalence rates for excess weight, calculated by self-report measures, were underestimated by 24% in men and by 28% in women; with corrections, the underestimation decreased to 8% and 10%, respectively. The results showed moderate agreement for self-report measures and substantial agreement for corrected measures compared to direct measures. The use of correction equations for self-report data proved to be a useful method for producing more trustworthy estimates of prevalence of overweight and obesity in the general population, usually estimated from self-report measures of weight and height in population surveys.

Los objetivos fueron: comparar medidas autoinformadas de peso y estatura con medidas evaluadas; evaluar el impacto de estas discrepancias sobre el índice de masa corporal (IMC) y las prevalencias de sobrepeso y obesidad; y aplicar modelos de corrección de las medidas autoinformadas y evaluar el grado de mejoría de las medidas corregidas, producidas por el uso de esos modelos. Se realizó un estudio transversal evaluando a 4.151 adultos (18 a 60 años), participantes en el Estudio Epidemiológico São Paulo Megacity. Se propusieron y probaron modelos de regresión lineal estratificados por sexo para la corrección de las medidas autoinformadas. Para evaluar la concordancia, se usó el coeficiente de correlación intraclase para las medidas evaluadas, medidas autoinformadas y medidas corregidas, y el coeficiente kappa para las categorías de clasificación del IMC. El peso autoinformado y el IMC resultantes fueron subestimados mientras la estatura fue sobrestimada, comparados con las medidas evaluadas. Con todos los modelos de corrección, las medidas corregidas se convirtieron en más cercanas a las medidas evaluadas. Las prevalencias de exceso de peso, cuando se calculan a partir de las medidas autoinformadas, estaban subestimadas en un 24% en hombres y un 28% en las mujeres; con las correcciones, la infravaloración disminuyó a un 8% y un 10%, respectivamente. Se identificó una concordancia moderada para las medidas autoinformadas y una concordancia sustancial para las medidas corregidas, cuando se compararon con las medidas reales. El uso de ecuaciones de corrección para dados autoinformados se mostró un método útil para producir estimaciones más fidedignas de la prevalencia de exceso de peso y obesidad en la población general, generalmente estimadas a partir de medidas de peso y estatura autoinformadas en las encuestas poblacionales.